Conference Report: The National Down Syndrome Society's 11th International Down Syndrome Research Conference on Cognition and Behaviour (Florida, November 1997)
Sue Buckley
A report on The National Down Syndrome Society's 11th International Down Syndrome Research Conference on Cognition and Behaviour in Florida in November 1997, focusing on infancy, speech and language, early communication and later social skills, reading and language, short-term memory, adolescence and early adulthood, adult mental health, issues for older adults and medical/genetic research.
Buckley SJ. Conference Report: The National Down Syndrome Society's 11th International Down Syndrome Research Conference on Cognition and Behaviour (Florida, November 1997). Down Syndrome News and Update. 1998;1(1);37-40.
doi:10.3104/updates.142
The National Down Syndrome Society held its 11th International Down Syndrome Research
Conference on Cognition and Behaviour in Florida in November 1997. I was
invited to participate in the 3 day meeting, giving me the opportunity to share
this summary with readers. I have attempted to review the main points from most
of the papers. Many of the presenters have published some or all of their work,
so if any reader would like more information on any topic please contact me and
I will provide references or put them in touch with authors. I have grouped the
papers into topic areas, starting with infancy and moving to adult issues, with
medical/genetic research at the end.
Infancy
The first presentation by Dr Rathe Karrer and Dr Jennifer Hill Karrer of the Smith
Mental Retardation Centre, University of Kansas outlined their research on attention
and cognition in infants. They explained how they are using measures of the electrical
activity of the brain called event-related potentials (ERPs) to study cognitive
development in infants. ERPs are measured by electrodes placed on the baby's scalp.
It is a harmless and non-invasive technique that can be used to measure brain responses
to stimuli presented to the baby. They are looking at responses to visual stimuli
such as attention, response to novelty and recognition memory in infants with and
without Down syndrome. They are engaged in longitudinal studies and may be able
to relate the ERP data to different rates of progress in the children.
ERP measures are being widely used in other centres in the UK and USA to study brain
development in infants and children with Down syndrome and to chart the effects
of different rates of functional development on specialisation in the brain. It
is even argued that the technique can be used to evaluate the effects of different
types of intervention or input on the development of the brain.
Speech and language
The next presentation by Dr Carolyn Mervis of the Department of Psychology, University
of Louisville, Kentucky, reviewed her research on vocabulary acquisition and on
children's ability to master category concepts. She pointed out that the ability
to form concepts and to categorise is critical to a child's ability to understand
and to organise their experience of the world. She has collected detailed longitudinal
data on five children with Down syndrome and they showed two rates of progress with
two children progressing like typical children and three progressing more slowly,
highlighting the variability to be expected in their development.
A second paper on language development was presented on the second day by Dr. Libby
Kumin, Department of Speech/Language Pathology. Loyola College, Maryland. She has
collected data on 115 children from two to five years by asking their parents to
complete the McArthur Communicative Development Inventory. This asks parents to
identify the words and sentences that their child is using from a checklist. Mean
vocabularies grew from 55 words at age two by approximately 100 words per year to
391 words at five years. However, variability at each age was very large (from 8
to 226 words for different children at two to 62 to 611 at five years). She also
reported on the emergence of early grammatical markers such as plurals, possessives
and past tenses. These also showed wide variation in the age they were achieved
by different children.
Both the papers on language illustrated the very different rates of language development
seen in different children with Down syndrome. Research which identifies the reasons
for these different rates of progress is needed if we are to become more effective
with individually targeted interventions matched to children's specific needs.
Early communication and later social skills
Dr Marion Sigman, from the School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles,
reported the findings of a longitudinal study of 70 children with Down syndrome
followed from pre-school to middle school years. In the pre-school years, the children's
ability to initiate interactions and to share in joint attention situations (e.g.
to attend to same object or activity with a communication partner) correlated highly
with verbal language development. Followed up eight to ten years later, those with
better interactive skills as infants were better socially integrated in the school
playground. Dr Sigman therefore emphasized the importance of following the baby's
lead and talking about what he or she is looking at to encourage these joint interaction
skills. She also observed that schools do not use playtimes as positively as they
could to teach and foster social interactions between children.
Reading and language
There were two papers on reading and speech and language development. In the first,
Dr Anne Fowler of the Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut reviewed the
research on language development, considering variation and progress in the four
different aspects of language skill. These are 1) phonology - how words are pronounced,
2) grammar, syntax and morphology- how sentences are constructed, 3) lexical knowledge
or vocabulary- the names and meanings of words 4) pragmatics - the rules governing
the way that conversations are conducted. Dr Fowler pointed out that not only is
there wide variation in overall language skill between children and adults with
Down syndrome, but there is also variation in the levels of difficulty experienced
within the four aspects of language for individuals. She also pointed out that current
research findings needed to be interpreted with caution as we have only just begun
to tap the full potential of persons with Down syndrome. With these caveats in mind,
she reported that typically, children with Down syndrome have more difficulty with
grammar and phonology than with vocabulary and pragmatics. She argued that phonological
memory (auditory short-term memory - often measured by digit span tasks) is a core
problem affecting language learning. For example in one study of young adults, correct
use of verbal auxiliaries (e.g. is and are in he is running, they are running) was
predicted by digit span, those with better digit spans having more correct use of
grammar. She also pointed out that some individuals achieve good language and some
good literacy skills also, the good readers also having better digit spans than
most people with Down syndrome.
My paper on stimulating reading and language through the school years addressed
some of the issues raised by Dr Fowler. Drawing on two longitudinal data sets collected
with colleagues here at The Sarah Duffen Centre and in the Department of Psychology,
University of Portsmouth, I argued that the better digit spans and better speech
and language skills of readers may be the consequence of learning to read rather
than causal factors. Studies of typically developing children would support the
view that this may be the case and that progress in either short memory, or speech
and language or reading skill will have a beneficial effect for the other two skills
- this is referred to as reciprocal causation or 'bootstrapping'. I also illustrated
the range of reading, spelling and comprehension progress being made by children
in our ongoing longitudinal study and the rate at which they are becoming alphabetic
readers (e.g able to use phonic knowledge to 'sound out' an unfamiliar word). It
appears that they move from relying on logographic (relying on visual memory of
whole words) to alphabetic strategies once they reach the reading levels of a typical
seven year old on our tests. This is very encouraging especially as the children
with Down syndrome are likely to have less good sound production and sound discrimination
abilities to support the learning of phonics.
Short-term memory
One of the factors thought to be causally linked to some of the language learning
difficulties is poor auditory (or verbal) short-term memory development in children
with Down syndrome. Dr Chris Jarrold, Dr Alan Baddeley and Dr Alexa Hewes, of the
University of Bristol. UK, presented their recent research on this topic as a poster
presentation. They compared the performance of children with Down syndrome, children
with moderate learning disability and typically developing children, all matched
for vocabulary comprehension, on verbal and visual spatial short-term memory tasks.
The children with Down syndrome have equivalent visual-spatial spans but significantly
lower verbal spans when compared to the other two groups of children. This difference
was not related to hearing loss or speech articulation rate for the children with
Down syndrome and they also showed no 'primacy' effect e.g. relatively good performance
on the first item in a list. The authors conclude that their results suggest a problem
in the phonological loop component of the working memory system - perhaps rapid
trace decay or increased interference from subsequent items entering memory. This
is an important area for further work as this system is critical for the support
of all learning.
Adolescence and early adulthood
Three papers discussed the needs of adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome.
Dr Don Van Dyke from the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinic, Iowa City presented
an overview. He identified that the major task of adolescence is separation from
the family. In early adolescence the main preoccupations for young people are growth
and puberty. For young people with Down syndrome puberty is usually reached at the
usual age, the growth spurt may be earlier and less and obesity may be a risk. This
is a time when appearance and self-image become important, so it is important to
encourage good hygiene, a pride in appearance and fashionable clothes. Friendships
and the peer group become important and leisure interests and social competence
will help the young person to be included. Dr Van Dyke emphasised the need for good
health care, including sex education, contraception and sexual health care to be
available to adults and adolescents with Down syndrome.
In a paper entitled Living in the Community, Dr Siegfried Pueschel discussed
the needs of adults if they are to participate fully in the community. He pointed
out that we need to consider planning for the transition from adolescence to adulthood,
for post-secondary education, for living and recreational options. We need to consider
social skills, relationships and sexuality, medical care and mental health issues.
Dr Pueschel emphasised the need for forward planning to build up self-esteem and
the social and practical skills that will be needed for meaningful participation
in the community. He also discussed employment and living options and the need for
preparation for relationships. He particularly stressed the value of leisure and
recreational activities, arguing that they can build self-confidence, improve motor
skills and physical fitness, increase independent functioning, nurture creativity
and self expression and provide opportunities for friendships.
Adult mental health
Dr William Cohen from Pennsylvania Children's Hospital, Pittsburgh, shared his experience
of treating behavioural problems of young people with Down syndrome at his specialist
Centre. About one third had some difficulty. The most common problems were defiant
or aggressive behaviours and adjustment difficulties - typical adolescent difficulties.
One person had depression, one panic attacks and another an eating disorder. For
all adolescents with disabilities, adolescence is a particularly difficult time
as they come to realise the real impact that their disability is having on their
lives when they see peers and siblings moving on in ways that they are unable to
achieve. In the young adults, less than one third had any problems and none were
aggressive. Depression, anxiety, eating disorders and obsessive compulsive disorder
were the type of problems seen, again problems occurring in a minority of the rest
of the population of this age. Dr Cohen gave examples of responses to treatments
for his patients and drew attention to one important issue. People with Down syndrome
may be inclined to talk to themselves when under stress. You and I will be worrying
silently in our heads, they are doing this worrying out loud and it is important
that it is not misinterpreted as a psychotic symptom.
A further paper on psychiatric disorders in adults with Down syndrome was presented
by Anna Mies and Kendra Moses of Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
giving similar outcomes in their clinic population. They pointed out that some 20%
to 30% of adults with Down syndrome may suffer from a mental disorder at some time.
They are less vulnerable than adults with learning disabilities from other causes,
but may be more likely to have depression or dementia in later life. It is important
that doctors and carers realise that a mental illness can occur and can be treated,
especially as some folk will have limited communication skills and their difficulties
be misinterpreted, so go untreated or be treated inappropriately.
Issues for older adults
Dr Dennis McGuire and Dr Brian Chicoine, from the Lutheran General Hospital, Glenview,
Illinois shared the results of their experience of working with some 600 adults
at their Adult Down Syndrome Centre. They had information on their self-help, social
and communication skills as well as their health care needs. Some 10% of adults
needed help with all daily living skills and a further 5% needed prompts. Of the
rest 38% were mostly independent, 40% needed some support in their lives and 7%
were able to manage selfcare but were not socially or practically independent. While
75% of adults had communication which was understood by caregivers most of the time,
only 28% could be understood most of the time by unfamiliar others. When it came
to expressing feelings, 78% could express them well non-verbally but only 39% verbally
and so many caregivers found it difficult to interpret the expressed emotions of
the person with Down syndrome that they were caring for. Especially vulnerable in
this respect were those with mental health problems (about 30% of the group).
The most common health issues were sensory deficits - of 602 people, 312 had impaired
vision and 247 had a significant hearing loss and 351 had impacted wax in their
ears! Overweight was an issue for 423 people, 222 were hypothyroid, 6 had vitamin
B12 deficiency and 11 were diabetic. 41 had developed seizures and only 33 suffered
from sleep apnoea suggesting it is less common in adults with Down syndrome than
in children. Of the 300 women in the study, 49 had passed the menopause and 89 suffered
from dysmenorrhea.
Of those with mental health problems, 87.5% were described as having a 'reversible'
or treatable disorder and only 12.5% had Alzheimers dementia. (This meant that only
26 of the total of 579 had dementia and they were all over 40 years of age). This
study also drew attention to the frequent occurrence of self-talk, which was reported
as used by 79% of the adults. Eighty percent were friendly and social, with only
20% described as anti-social or inappropriate in their behaviour at times.
Medical/genetic research
There were two papers in which the progress in understanding the genetics of Down
syndrome was reviewed. One emphasized the search for links between genetic profiles
and cognitive profiles, the other explained the potential of trisomic mouse models
for testing some of these hypotheses. Both these speakers gave similar presentations
at the Vancouver conference in April 1998, which I will be reporting on in the next
issue, so I will include a little more detail then.
Two papers discussed the search for effective pharmacological treatments for some
of the abnormalities in biochemical functioning and the health risks associated
with Down syndrome. One was presented by Dr Alberto Costa of the Jackson Laboratory,
Bar Harbor and the other by Dr George Capone of the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore.
These were both speculative papers, discussing the areas in which research might
be worthwhile based on our current knowledge and the enormous methodological difficulties
facing such research. Dr Capone pointed out that there is a need to develop a valid
and reliable protocol for accurately measuring the development of children with
Down syndrome before the effectiveness over time of any interventions can be reliably
evaluated.
The American Down Syndrome Medical Interest Group, which includes many of the most
expert medical practitioners, biochemists and geneticists in this field, had its
meeting at this conference. (A number of these experts are also parents of children
with Down syndrome themselves). This meant that there was discussion of health guidelines,
areas that need further research and exchange of good practice. (There was also
extensive discussion of the problems being caused by the promotion of Targeted Nutritional
Interventions ('TNI') despite the lack of evidence for the wild claims being made
for its efficacy by those selling it or those using it in their private practices).
The view of this expert group, which is to not recommend the use of 'TNI', can be
found on the NDSS website ( http://www.ndss.org
).
My views on this are made clear elsewhere in this issue and on our website. The
most distressing aspect of this whole sorry debate is the unnecessary stress and
anxiety being caused to new parents by the conflicting information that they are
being bombarded with at present.
The Author
Sue Buckley is Professor of Developmental Disability at the Department of Psychology
at the University of Portsmouth, UK. She is also Director of The Centre for Disability
Studies at The University of Portsmouth and Director of Research and Information
Services at The Down Syndrome Educational Trust. She also serves as a Non-Executive
Director of the Portsmouth and South East Hampshire District Health Authority and
on the boards of the European Down Syndrome Association and the International Down
Syndrome Federation.