Parent/carer ratings of self-talk behaviour in children and adults with Down syndrome in Canada and the United Kingdom
Paul Patti, Nancy Andiloro and Maureen Gavin
Parents of children and adults with Down syndrome have observed many of them engage in self-talk or ‘private speech’. They may use self-talk to work out situations, express inner feelings, and entertain themselves. Some reports have stressed that this behaviour is not a delusion or hallucination. The Self-Talk Survey was developed to investigate the quality, style, and content of self-talk. Surveys from Canada and the United Kingdom were obtained on 97 males and 80 females with Down syndrome aged 5–60 years. Analysis revealed that self-talk was present in 91% of the survey sample and occurred less frequently when the person was alone. A person’s age and level of disability did not influence their ability to engage in self talk. Observed self-talk was generally understandable and displayed in a normal tone. A person’s self-talk was typically directed to themselves, but could also involve a real or imaginary person or a favourite toy/object. The content of self-talk focused on an event that recently occurred or was expected to occur, a television programme or movie, family or friends, completion of an activity, or various complaints. Self-talk also served as an outlet for planning or rehearsing an activity, working out a problem, or as a self-dialogue about something interesting or important.
doi:10.3104/reports.2063
Introduction
Self-talk or talking out loud to oneself (also referred to as ‘private
speech’) is a common behaviour in young children and plays an important role
in the development of higher-level thinking and self-directional skills.
Developmentally, children engage in self-talk to coordinate their actions
and thoughts. During focused goal-directed activities, self-talk/private
speech systematically becomes more selective in 4-year-old children than in
3 year olds[1]. By the age of 6 or 7 years, most children stop talking out
loud to themselves and develop an internal dialogue when working out
problems or challenging tasks[2].
In certain situations, people engage in
self-talk (either positive or negative) during periods of stress or conflict
or to motivate themselves. Negative self-talk has been found to increase
during levels of affective stress in children and adolescents with anxiety
and depression[3,4]. Studies of the use of self-talk in people engaged in
exercise and competitive sports have found that exercisers and athletes use
self-talk as a positive, motivating behaviour to enhance their
performance[5,6,7]. Few studies have been conducted on self-talk behaviour
in people with intellectual disabilities. Self-talk has been a common
observation by parents of children and adults with Down syndrome[8,9]. It
was postulated that self-talk is an important aspect of the thought
processes of people with Down syndrome when they are working out difficult
situations, expressing feelings, and entertaining themselves[10]. No
association was found between self-talk/private speech and behaviour
problems, communication difficulties, or social isolation. However,
self-talk in adults with Down syndrome has sometimes been incorrectly
considered to be hallucinatory behaviour [11,12].
A review of over 500
children and adults with Down syndrome (ages 11-83 years) seen in a wellness
clinic in Chicago revealed that 81% engaged in conversations with themselves
or with imaginary companions[8]. It was speculated that they engaged in
self-talk to vent feelings, to cope with or problem-solve a situation, to
entertain themselves or to direct their behaviour and make sense of
frustrating or confusing situations. In some cases, it was found that the
person’s speech was clearer when talking to himself or herself than when
carrying out a conversation with others. The reason for this may be that
there is less social pressure when the person is speaking to himself or
herself [10].
In the United Kingdom, a formal study interviewed parents of
young people with Down syndrome who were talking out loud to themselves [9].
The study group comprised 77 people with Down syndrome ages 17 to 24 years.
Findings indicated that 91% engaged in self-talk or had done so in the past
as reported by their parents. Private speech involved talking to objects,
self-dialogue, self-direction, describing an activity, and muttering. The
presence or absence of self-talk was influenced by the mental age of the
individual, and appeared to follow the expected developmental pattern.
Self-talk was absent in persons with a calculated mental age below 37
months, while for persons with a mental age above 128 months, self-talk was
not currently reported by their parents but had been an observed behaviour
in the past. The authors concluded that the presence of self-talk should be
seen as an adaptive behaviour rather than an indication of pathology[9].
A
study from South Australia found that 90% of 104 people with Down syndrome
ages 8 to 35 years engaged in self-talk (as reported by their parents) [13].
Most parents considered self-talk to be a useful tool for their child and
were not overly concerned about the behaviour. Self-talk took the form of a
monologue, dialogue, commentary, entertainment-presentation, or role-playing
outlet, and served as a method of self-regulation, debriefing oneself,
decision-making, moral reasoning, fantasy/entertainment, and working through
emotional problems [13].
Thus far, reports and observations have indicated
that many people with Down syndrome talk to themselves or engage in some
type of fantasy that is similar to normal coping mechanisms of children.
Some reports stressed that this behaviour is not a hallucination or
delusion[10,11]. If self-talk dramatically changes in its tone or frequency
of occurrence, this change may signal a psychological problem such as
depression, anxiety, physical pain, or some type of illness [10,14].
Self-talk and behaviour rituals were found to be common behavioural features
in adults with Down syndrome, and in most instances, were not a sign of a
psychiatric disorder [15]. In a cohort of 206 people with Down syndrome seen
in a diagnostic clinic (mean age 47 years), 23% were reported by group home
staff to engage in some type of self-talk behaviour; however, only 5% were
diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. In an earlier report on depression in
people with Down syndrome, it was likely that some of the individuals
thought to be responding to an internal dialogue classified as
hallucinations were actually engaged in self-talk behaviour [16]. It was
suggested that clinicians should observe the individual for any change in
the quality or content of their self-talk, such as an increase or decrease
in volume, or any expressions of fear or anger. It is these types of
changes, rather than the mere presence of self-talk, that may indicate
psychopathology [14,15].
Other than the two studies cited above [9,13], no
other formal studies have investigated self-talk behaviour in either people
with Down syndrome or other intellectual disabilities. This paper presents
the results of a family survey of children and adults with Down syndrome
from Canada and the United Kingdom who engage in self-talk behaviour and
discusses the nature and function of this behaviour.
Method
Design of the Self-Talk Survey
To examine the characteristics of self-talk behaviour, an 18-item
questionnaire was constructed. The Self-Talk Survey [see
Appendix A] was one
part of a two-part family survey developed for parents as the respondents.
The aim of the Self-Talk Survey was twofold: (1) to determine the incidence
of people with Down syndrome who talk to themselves, and (2) to evaluate the
quality, style, and content of self-talk in those individuals. The three
primary questions explored in the survey are: (1) Who do people who
self-talk appear to be talking to? (2) Where and when does it typically
occur? (3) What do self-talkers usually talk about?
Survey distribution
Approval from the authors’ Institutional Review Board was obtained for
the design and distribution of the Self-Talk Survey. The survey was
distributed to families in Canada and the United Kingdom. The only inclusion
criteria were that the individual have Down syndrome, be chronologically
older than age 5 years, and possess some degree of expressive language.
In
Canada, a total of 297 surveys were mailed to parents and caregivers who
were linked to the national registry of the Down Syndrome Research
Foundation (DSRF) in Vancouver, British Columbia. A total of 95 surveys were
returned, resulting in a 32% response rate from the Canadian registry of the
DSRF. An additional seven completed surveys were obtained from family care
providers in Ontario not included in the registry. The majority of returned
surveys came from the provinces of British Columbia and Ontario. The mean
age of the individuals was 20.01 years (SD = 13.44) and ranged in age from 5
to 60 years (Figure 1).

Figure 1 | Age distribution of Canadian sample
Note: N = 102
In the United Kingdom, a notice about the survey
project was placed in the DS Scotland News, the quarterly newsletter of
Down’s Syndrome Scotland, and in the DSA Journal, the quarterly magazine of
the Down’s Syndrome Association (UK). A total of 79 families requested and
returned a completed survey; four were excluded because of missing data or
because the child surveyed was younger than 5 years of age. The majority of
respondents were from counties throughout Scotland and England. The mean age
of the individuals was 19.17 years (SD = 8.54) and ranged in age from 5 - 49
years (Figure 2).

Figure 2 | Age distribution of United Kingdom
sample Note: N = 75
Data analysis
Ratings for each of the 18 items on the questionnaire were coded, and
descriptive statistics were conducted using computerised statistical
software [17]. Data for each item was summarised and then converted into
percentages. A series of logistical regressions were conducted on age,
gender, and level of disability.
Results
The survey sample consisted of 177 individuals (97 males, 80 females)
with Down syndrome. The level of disability for each individual was recorded
on the background information sheet by respondents, and ranged from profound
(2%), profound to severe (4%), severe (15%), moderate (50%), and mild (21%).
For 15 individuals (8%), the level of disability was either missing or
unknown. In almost all cases, the person being surveyed lived at home, and
the respondent was a parent. A total of 162 individuals (91%) were reported
to engage in self-talk behaviour. Thirty-five respondents (20%) reported
that the individual had self-talked in the past, while 13 (7.5%) reported
that they did not self-talk in the past. The majority of the respondents
(72%) moved on to the next item without answering this question (Question 2)
since most currently self-talked.
A preliminary analysis was conducted to
test whether self-talk would be different in the Canadian and UK samples. A
chi-square analysis revealed no significant difference between the two
samples (χ2 [1, N = 174] = 3.25, p > .05), indicating that the country in
which the person resides did not influence self-talk behaviour.
Questions
that required a response of ‘Yes’, ‘Sometimes’ or ‘No’ are summarised in
Table 1. The majority of parent respondents (75%) reported that their
child’s self-talk first began in childhood and that it has been persisting
for many years (74%) with most ratings indicating that they did not stop
talking to themselves for one or more months (71%). When asked if the
child/adult self-talked only when alone, a combined 101 parents/carers (62%)
responded ‘No’ or ‘Sometimes’. The ratings on where self-talk usually occurs
was re-coded on the basis of the more general categorisations of House,
Public, or All Places. The data was equally divided and revealed self-talk
to occur only in the home (45%) or in all places (45%). Only one parent
indicated that their child self-talks only in public – specifically, while
waiting for a taxi.
| Item # |
Question |
Yes(%) |
Sometimes
(%) |
No
(%) |
Don’t know
(%) |
| 5 |
Do they
self-talk only when they are alone? |
36 |
|
47 |
- |
| 7 |
When other
people are sitting near them, do they continue to self-talk?
|
26 |
36 |
36 |
- |
|
8
|
When
approached by other people, do they stop talking to themselves? |
62 |
28 |
9 |
- |
| 9 |
Have they
ever stopped talking to themselves for one or more months? |
5 |
6 |
71 |
17 |
| 10 |
Is the
person’s self-talk disturbing or disrupting to other people? |
|
31 |
62 |
- |
| 12 |
Does the
person’s self-talk affect their ability to focus or concentrate at
work or in school? |
8 |
19 |
68 |
- |
| 13 |
Does the
person’s self-talk affect their ability to interact with or relate
to other people? |
9 |
29 |
60 |
- |
Note: All percentages rounded to the nearest
whole number.
Table 1 | Parent/carer ratings to questions 5,7,8,9,10,12 and 13
When asked if self-talk continues when someone sits near
the person, a combined 101 parents/carers (62%) answered ‘Yes’ or
‘Sometimes’. However, when approached by other people, 146 (90%) reported
that the person would cease their self-talk. Parents/carers were also asked
if self-talk is disturbing or disrupting to other people. A total of 101
(62%) checked that it is not disturbing. When asked if self-talk behaviour
affects the person’s ability to focus at work or in school, 111 (68%)
answered ‘No’. Similarly, 98 (60%) reported that the person’s self-talk does
not affect their ability to interact with others.
Ratings on the quality and
volume of self-talk are summarised in Figure 3. Self-talk was ‘mostly
understandable’ (51%) and spoken in a ‘normal tone’ (51%). This makes
parent/carer ratings for the remaining survey questions about the content of
self-talk more reliable, since they are able to accurately decipher the
character and content of the child/adult’s self-talk behaviour.

Figure 3 | Ratings on the quality and volume of
self-talk behaviour. Note: N = 162. a. Quality of
self-talk behaviour b. Volume of self-talk behaviour

Figure 4 | Ratings specifying to whom
individuals speak while self-talking. Note: N =
162, see Appendix for item details.
The
person(s) or object(s) to whom the person appears to be talking are
summarised in Figure 4. More than half of the respondents (64%) indicated
that the person’s self-talk was directed to ‘himself/herself’. Other
responses included ‘someone that they know’ (32%), ‘an imaginary person’
(30%), ‘favourite toys or objects’ (25%), and/or ‘a superhero, sports
figure, TV/Movie character’ (24%). When asked what the person usually talks
about, parent/carer responses were more diverse. From the listed choices,
the most frequently checked were ‘an upcoming event’ (53%), ‘something that
happened that day’ (52%), ‘favourite TV programme or movie’ (46%),
‘completing an activity or action’ (45%), ‘familiar people’ (38%),
‘complaining about someone/something’ (37%), and a ‘traumatic or an
upsetting event’ (32%). Additional responses were also checked but were much
lower in frequency of occurrence (Figure 5). Parents/carers were asked to
indicate if any additional behaviours occur during self-talk (Figure 6).
From the listed choices, the most frequently identified were ‘become angry
or upset’ (30%) and ‘change their voice’ as if to imitate another person
(31%).

Figure 5 | Ratings specifying what individuals talk about while
self-talking. Note: N = 162, see Appendix for item details.

Figure 6 | Ratings of individuals’ emotions and
behaviour while self-talking. Note: N = 162, see
Appendix for item details
To determine whether the presence of self-talk was predicted by age,
level of disability, or gender, a series of logistic regressions were
conducted for each factor (Table 2). Prior to running the analysis, the age
of each person was log-transformed to correct for the positive skew of the
distribution (skewness = 1.42). Results revealed that none of the factors
significantly predicted whether or not a person was described as a
self-talker.
| Predictor |
B |
SE |
Wald χ 2
|
p |
Odds Ratio |
| Age |
-0.28 |
0.42 |
0.45 |
0.50 |
0.75 |
| Gender |
0.25 |
0.52 |
0.23 |
0.63 |
1.29 |
| Level of disability |
0.26 |
0.20 |
0.02 |
0.90 |
1.03 |
| Constant |
-2.00 |
|
|
|
|
Note: For all chi-squares:
df = 3, N = 174. Age was log-transformed to
resemble a normal distribution.
Table 2 | Logistic regression predicting
self-talk behaviour
|
Discussion
The results revealed that 91% of 177 persons in the survey engaged in
self-talk and that this behaviour has been occurring for many years. This
was consistent with past findings that a high percentage of children and
adults with Down syndrome self-talk regardless of age. Although a selection
bias may exist from the parents/carers who responded to the direct mailing
or the newsletter notices the survey data provided two distinct samples of
self-talkers to be studied. Over 70% of persons surveyed were in the
moderate to mild level of disability, indicating a mental age well above 36
months. Although older adults (> age 30 years) represented 23% of the survey
sample, age and the level of disability were not found to be factors in the
individuals’ ability to engage in self-talk behaviour.
Self-talk was not a
solitary behaviour and often occurred when other people were in close
proximity. However, when someone approached and interacted with the person,
self-talk was very likely to stop. When observed or overheard, self-talk was
understandable and displayed in a normal tone of voice in more than half the
individuals. Parent/carer ratings indicated that self-talk behaviour was
generally not disturbing or disruptive to other people, and did not affect
the person’s ability to interact with others or to concentrate at work or
school. However, more than 37% of parents/carers noted that self-talk was
sometimes an inhibiting social factor. This observation suggests that for
some individuals, self-talk may be a preferred behaviour over communicating
or interacting with others. One parent commented that her daughter
"doesn’t
like to be asked what she is talking about; as far as she is concerned, it
is a private conversation."
The majority of parents/carers (64%) indicated
that the person’s self-talk was directed toward themselves, and often took
the form of a self-dialogue to work through an action or activity. Some
parents reported that self-talk helps their child to process thoughts and
guide them to review and practice what to do next. One parent observed,
"Self-talk is an outlet that allows her to say whatever she wants without
someone interfering or challenging her. She self-talks to hear what she has
learned, read or seen as a way of understanding it. We [parents] feel that
this is a processing tool for her."
Another parent commented,
"Perhaps he
talks to his thumb because he can’t get people to understand what he is
saying."
As seen in Figure 4, self-talk also involved other people or
objects. One parent commented,
"He uses objects as a puppet and consults
with it all day long; if nothing is available, he curves his fingers and
uses his hand."
The frequency of self-talk being directed to an imaginary
person was somewhat less than expected. The present findings revealed
‘talking to an imaginary person’ was present in 30% of the survey sample,
however, the frequency of self-talk directed to ‘someone they know’ was
similar (32%), and was only slightly lower for a ‘favourite toy or object’
(25%) or ‘someone famous’ (24%), suggesting no clear preferred target for
self-talk other than to oneself.
The view that self-talk serves to assist in
planning, rehearsing, debriefing and self-calming was supported by the
present results. More than half of respondents reported that self-talk
involved upcoming or recent events in the person’s daily life. In some
instances, self-talk specifically involved happy or traumatic events. A
favourite movie or television programme as the focus of self-talk had the
third highest incidence. It is speculated that some self-talkers develop a
close bond with a movie or television character and confide in that ‘person’
during their self-talk.
Some self-talk also involved complaints about
someone or something. Almost 33% of parents/carers reported that the person
might become angry or upset during self-talk and, in some instances, imitate
another’s voice as a means of directing oneself to deal with a particular
problem or event. One parent indicated that their son talks non-stop when he
is stressed. Another parent indicated that her son "talks himself down at
the end of the day." From the ratings, there was little to suggest any
indications of psychotic or psychiatric disturbance. Seeing or hearing
someone in the room (indicative of hallucinatory behaviour) was reported by
only a few respondents. Indications are that most respondents viewed
self-talk as a positive behaviour and not a cause of concern.
It has been
the opinion of McGuire and Chicoine[10], and others that it is best not to
stop or discourage self-talk behaviour, but rather to make it more socially
acceptable. If self-talk is disruptive or disturbing, it may be necessary to
discuss with the person appropriate locations for their self-talk. The
quality, style, and content of self-talk expressed can provide some insight
as to what they are thinking and indicate if something or someone is
troubling them. It is also important to determine if the child/adult
actually sees their imaginary friend and believes that this person is really
there. Additionally, changes in the frequency, location, or volume of
self-talk, as well as self-talk that results in agitation, fear, or sadness
should be investigated since this may represent an underlying physical or
psychological problem that needs to be addressed.
Further studies are
necessary to explore any differences in the manner and content of self-talk
behaviour among children, adolescents, and adults with Down syndrome. Does
self-talk in children and adolescents involve more toys, objects, imaginary
friends, and television/movie characters compared to adults in whom
self-talk may focus more on social or relationship issues? Another factor to
consider is that many older adults with Down syndrome live outside of the
family home (i.e., group homes, supportive living settings), resulting in
potentially more social issues, challenges, and conflicts, which may
maintain the need for self-talk as a self-guide to work through problems or
life issues as they arise.
To date, studies on the incidence of self-talk in
people with other intellectual disabilities have not been reported. The
authors are currently distributing the Self-Talk Survey to parents of
children and adults with autism, fragile X syndrome, and other
intellectual/learning disabilities to investigate if there are any
qualitative differences from the present findings.
References
- Winsler A, Carlton MP, Barry MJ.
Age-related changes in preschool children’s systematic use of private
speech in a natural setting. Journal of Child Language.
2000;27:665-687.
- Kohlberg L, Yaeger J, Hjertholm E.
Private speech: four studies and a review of theories. Child
Development. 1968;39:781-736.
- Ronan KR, Kendall PC. Self-talk in
distressed youth: states-of-mind and content specificity. Journal of
Clinical Child Psychology. 1997;26(4):330-337.
- Lodge J, Harte DK, Tripp G. Children’s
self-talk under conditions of mild anxiety. Journal of Anxiety
Disorders. 1998;12(2):153-176.
- Gammage K, Hardy J, Hall CR. A
description of self-talk in exercise. Psychology of Sport and
Exercise. 2001;2:233-247.
- Hardy J, Hall CR, Alexander MR. Exploring
self-talk and affective states in sport. Journal of Sports Science.
2001;19(7):469-475.
- Hardy J, Hall CR, Hardy L. Quantifying
athlete self-talk. Journal of Sports Science.
2005;23(9):905-917.
- McGuire D, Chicoine B, Greenbaum E.
Self-talk in adults with Down syndrome. Disability Solutions. 1997;2(1):1-4.
- Glenn SM, Cunningham CC. Parents’ reports
of young people with Down syndrome talking out loud to themselves.
Mental Retardation. 2000;38(6):498-505.
- McGuire D, Chicoine B. Self-talk,
imaginary friends, and fantasy life. In: Mental Wellness in Adults
with Down Syndrome: A Guide to Emotional and Behavioral Strengths and
Challenges. Woodbine House, Inc; 2006. p.136-146.
- Hurley AD. The misdiagnosis of
hallucinations and delusions in persons with mental retardation: A
neurodevelopmental perspective. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry.
1996;1(2):122-133.
- McGuire D, Chicoine B. Depressive
disorders in adults with Down syndrome. Habilitative Mental
Healthcare Newsletter. 1996;15(1):26-27.
- Opolski J. ‘Still talking...':
Continuing the investigation of self-talk of people with Down syndrome.
Down Syndrome Quarterly (Special World Congress Edition).
2006:8;79.
- McGuire D, Chicoine B. Life issues of
adolescents and adults with Down syndrome. In: Cohen W, Nadel L and
Madnick M, editors. Down Syndrome: Visions for the 21st Century.
New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002. p. 221-236.
- Patti PJ, Tsiouris J. Emotional and
behavioral disturbances in adults with Down syndrome. In: Davidson, P,
Prasher, V and Janicki, M, editors. Mental Health, Intellectual
Disabilities and the Aging Process. London: Blackwell; 2003. p.
81-93.
- Myers B, Pueschel S. Major depression in
a small group of adults with Down syndrome. Research in
Developmental Disabilities. 1995:16;285-299.
- Statistical Package
for the Social Sciences-11.5.1. SPSS, Chicago, IL; 2002.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by funds from the Research Foundation
for Mental Hygiene (Project Number 1002416). The authors wish to thank Anne
Eichmann and the Down Syndrome Research Foundation in Burnaby, British
Columbia, for distributing our survey in Canada. In the United Kingdom, we
wish to thank Dr. Heather Wilkinson and Fiona Anderson from the Centre for
Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh; and Down’s
Syndrome Scotland, and the Down’s Syndrome Association (UK) for all their
assistance in obtaining the completed surveys in the UK. We also wish to
thank all the parents who kindly completed the Self-Talk Survey and provided
us with information about their child’s self-talk behaviour. Finally, we
wish to thank Dr. Amy K. Eshleman for her assistance with data analysis.
Funding
(see acknowledgements above)
Author contributions
Paul J. Patti, primary author, coordinated the collection of all data and
completed the writing of this manuscript. Nancy Andiloro performed the data
analysis and constructed the table and figures in this manuscript. Maureen
Gavin assisted in obtaining the completed surveys and in the writing of this
manuscript. There are no competing interests associated with any of the
contributing authors.
Received: 21 January 2008; Revised version received: 2 June 2008;
Accepted: 9 June 2008; Published online: August 2009
Self-Talk Survey
- Does the person currently engage in self-talk (talking out loud
to himself or herself)?
Yes...... No...... Don’t Know......
- If the person does not talk out loud to himself or herself now, did
they ever do this in the past?
Yes...... No...... Don’t Know.....
(If you answered No or Don’t Know to question 1 and 2, skip the rest of
this survey!
- When did the person first begin to self-talk?
in childhood...... in adolescence...... in adulthood...... Don’t
Know......
- How long have you observed the person talking to himself or
herself?
past 6 months...... more than 1 year...... many years...... Don’t
Know......
- Do they self-talk only when they are alone?
Yes...... Sometimes....... No......
- Where do they usually self-talk? (Please check all that apply)
bedroom..... living room..... bathroom..... car / van..... social
functions.....
school / day program..... other..... All Places.....
- When other people are sitting near them, do they continue to
self-talk?
Yes...... Sometimes...... No......
- When approached by other people, do they stop talking to themselves?
Yes...... Sometimes....... No......
- Have they ever stopped talking to themselves for one or more months?
Yes...... Sometimes...... No...... Don’t Know
- Is the person’s self-talk disturbing or disrupting to other people?
Yes...... Sometimes...... No......
- If their self-talk is disturbing to others, please indicate where:
(Please check all that apply) classroom or day program...... in the
home...... public areas (shopping malls, restaurants)...... other areas (specify:) ........
- Does the person’s self-talk affect their ability to focus and
concentrate at work or in school?
Yes...... Sometimes...... No......
- Does the person’s self-talk affect their ability to interact with or
relate to other people?
Yes...... Sometimes...... No......
- When they self-talk, rate the quality of their speech:
understandable...... sometimes understandable...... muttered or not
understandable.......
- When they self-talk, rate the volume of their speech:
loud...... normal...... tone low / whisper...... inaudible (mouth moves,
no sound)......
- When they self-talk, whom do they usually appear to talk to? (Please
check all that apply) someone that they know...... a deceased relative or
friend (specify: )...... a superhero, sports figure, TV / Movie
character...... an imaginary person...... an object in room...... TV or
radio...... Himself/herself...... Other:...... Don’t Know.......
- When they self-talk, what do they usually talk about? (Please
check all that apply)
something that happened that day...... traumatic or an upsetting
event...... happy event...... an upcoming activity...... eating or getting
food...... favourite toy or object...... seeing / hearing someone in the
room...... favourite TV program or Movie...... familiar people (family /
friends)...... someone bothering / hurting them...... describe completing an
activity or action...... complaining about something / someone......
Other:...... Don’t Know.......
- When they self-talk, does any of the following occur? (Please check
all that apply)
become angry or upset...... appear frightened or afraid...... cry or
become sad...... curse or yell...... change their voice (imitate another’s
voice)...... self-talk when sleeping...... Other:......
[Not applicable...... ]
Comments:
Thank-you, your responses will help us to better understand people who
self-talk.