Moving Daniel to mainstream at 9 years old
Margaret Churchill
Daniel is 10 1/2 years old, and has been in mainstream school for nearly two terms, since September 1992. The school is a small C. E. Primary school with 115 children on roll arranged in 4 classes, so each class spans two year groups. Daniel is in year 5, with other children of his own age, and one year older. Previously he was at a special school for mild learning difficulties from the age of 2 1/2 years.
Churchill M. Moving Daniel to mainstream at 9 years old. Down Syndrome Research and Practice. 1993;1(2);81-83.
doi:10.3104/practice.16
Daniel is 10½ years old, and has been in mainstream school for nearly two
terms, since September 1992. The school is a small C. E. Primary school
with 115 children on roll arranged in 4 classes, so each class spans two
year groups. Daniel is in year 5, with other children of his own age, and
one year older. Previously he was at a special school for mild learning
difficulties from the age of 2½ years. The only integration he had experienced
at his previous school was a weekly visit to a very large junior school
to participate in a games session, from the age of about 8 1/2. He was used
to a very small class of about 8-9 children with a teacher and a full time
ancillary.
There was very little time to prepare for Daniel's entry into mainstream
school as I was not appointed until two days before he was due to start.
However, I was able to contact his previous teacher who visited me and was
very helpful in outlining Daniel's abilities and achievements to date. She
gave me a clear picture of the range of activities he had been used to undertaking,
showed me the reading books he had been using, and as I was also able to
visit his classroom during a school day, I had the chance to see first hand
the environment he had been used to.
I knew Daniel's parents a little socially, so there was already a link there
on which we could build. I spent time at their house talking to Daniel and
his parents, and this was very useful in getting my relationship with Daniel
off to a good start. He accepted me immediately and was eager to show me
his computer and a host of other toys, and to talk. He was very eager to
start at his new school, and as his first day happened to fall on his 10th
birthday, he was understandably very excited!
Daniel's parents have worked extremely hard with him over the years as I
knew from previous contact with them, and they had a long drawn out battle
with the L.E.A. to try and get Daniel into mainstream school, as he had
never been assessed as being suitable. However, when the decision was finally
made to allow him a trial period in mainstream school, they agreed to a
generous provision in terms of teaching time and ancillary help. I am in
school for Daniel every morning and he has a full time ancillary. I have
found from talking to other teachers in similar posts to mine that this
is exceptional, but I cannot stress strongly enough that I feel this has
been crucial to the success of Daniel's inclusion in mainstream school.
It must also be said that over and above the teaching and ancillary hours
he has, several people including myself work many extra hours to ensure
that Daniel's needs are met to the best of our ability. For example, I feel
it is important to be present at his speech therapy appointments which mean
giving up an afternoon to go with Daniel and his mother to the local Health
Centre. I find these sessions very helpful in planning the work I will do
with him between appointments, which come round about every 3 months. The
speech therapist assesses his progress since his last visit, talks to us
and gives us guidelines for further work.
Daniel has also benefited greatly from a weekly P.E. specialist who has
been working with him on co ordination and quick response skills. This time
is also given free and is extremely valuable to Daniel.
Neither myself nor Daniel's ancillary had any previous experience or training
for working with special needs children. His ancillary had been working
as a lunch time supervisor at the school and doing some voluntary work with
the reception class. I have close links with the school as both my daughters
are there, and over the last few years I had worked in school on a voluntary
basis, on supply and on a job share for one term. So for the first few weeks
we were very much feeling our way, learning as we went along, and gathering
information from as many different sources as I could find, not least the
staff at the Portsmouth Down Syndrome Trust with whom Daniel's parent's
had already formed links. I found it a very exciting challenge, and still
do, and happily Daniel responded very well from the start. His mother advised
me to be enthusiastic and make tasks fun and he would respond, and that
has proved to be an invaluable piece of advice!
During his first half term I worked on two special projects with him, besides
all the usual basic language and number work. We went out and took photographs
of his route from home to school, the school buildings inside and out, the
children at playtime, work time and lunch time and put together an album
for which he typed out captions on the computer. We then visited his previous
school to show this to his teacher and friends, and to see what they were
doing. This was useful in familiarising him with his new surroundings and
to show him how such a piece of work could be used to communicate information
that would have been hard for him to put into words.
The other project was a book about himself which gave opportunities for
him to express his likes and dislikes, any special interests and clarify
for him his new school routines and procedures. He was very pleased with
the finished results, as he has produced two books of which he was justifiably
proud!
Daniel's ancillary found the first few weeks fairly daunting and Daniel
was sometimes uncooperative and difficult with her. Although he had been
used to working with an ancillary, he seemed unsure of her role. Also she
was mainly responsible for him in the afternoons after a morning of fairly
intensive input, so he was quite often tired. As Daniel began to settle
and feel part of the school, things steadily improved and now they have
a very good working relationship. I feel it was a great deal to ask of someone
to step into a role of this kind with no training at all and only a hazy
outline of what exactly was required of her, and I feel I have been very
fortunate in having someone who was prepared to battle on when things got
tough and who has consequently become invaluable.
For the first half term, I was withdrawing Daniel from the class for at
least half of his teaching time in the mornings, and most of his activities
in class were tailored very much to his individual needs and not linked
with what the rest of the class were doing. This allowed me to get to know
Daniel well fairly quickly, establish a good working relationship with him
and assess exactly what he was capable of doing. But it could scarcely be
called integration as he was not participating in class activities except
for P.E. lessons, assemblies and playtimes, and a weekly music lesson for
the whole class.
I did set up a weekly language group session, taking four children at a
time from the reception class, and including Daniel in this group to take
the pressure off him and give him the stimulus of listening to and talking
to other children in a controlled situation. This has proved to be a very
valuable venture for several reasons. It has given the youngest children
a chance to get to know Daniel and dispel any alarm they may have been feeling
because he talks and behaves a little differently to them, and for Daniel,
it has given him a respite from one to one contact with me and an opportunity
to see how the others respond, communicate and react to a task, and use
this as a model for his own responses and behaviour. He really enjoys these
sessions, takes his turn well and is very keen to participate and contribute.
I have used a wide variety of activities and language games, usually based
on toys or household objects with which they would be familiar as an initial
stimulus. Games such as 'What's in the bag?' -each child takes out object
in turn, describes it without naming the object, and the others have to
try and guess what it is from their description. The others can ask questions
like "What is it made of?", "What do we do with it?", "Has it got a handle,
is it sharp, prickly, soft or rough?" etc.
Towards the end of his first term, I started to try and involve Daniel more
in what the rest of the class were doing, and the Christmas play provided
the perfect opportunity for this. He was a little reluctant to get involved
at first, but as the play began to take shape he got to know the story and
the songs, and began to participate with obvious enjoyment. After the first
performance, about which he was very excited, he took the applause like
a veteran bowing and smiling as though it was his very own production! That
was a very special moment -it was lovely to see him so happy and at home
after only a few weeks in a very different environment to the one which
he had been used to previously, and emphasised to me again how amazingly
adaptable children are, and how readily they rise to meet new challenges
in life. He also adapted quickly to the every day school procedures and
became used to the pattern of work and playtimes, what to do at lunch time,
getting ready for P.E. and similar daily routines. This must have all seemed
quite daunting to him at first, but the combination of the hard work his
parents and previous teachers have put in to give him a high level of independence,
and the acceptance and help he has had from the other children has made
him feel part of the school -one of the family -very quickly.
There is an exceptionally special `family feel' about the school, and the
children right through from the youngest to the eldest have been very welcoming,
friendly and accommodating towards Daniel, including him in their games,
helping him when necessary and generally making him feel one of them. They
do not always understand what he says as his speech is garbled and indistinct
at times, but they seem to communicate effectively even so, and Daniel's
attitude to school shows that he is happy there.
Socially, Daniel did have a few problems at first, not so much with his
classmates, but with some of the younger children who he tends to gravitate
towards in the playground. There were a few incidents where he was being
treated as a novelty (understandably) and being provoked in to aggressive
behaviour by some of the children, and sometimes he can be aggressive when
there is no provocation, but the frequency of such incidents and behaviour
has steadily decreased.
We dealt with this by increasing the level of supervision on the playground,
reminding him every time he went out of the kind of behaviour we expected
of him, and we tried to direct his play more by initiating a game and then
leaving him to play, either on his own or with a group. Most playtimes now
are happy and incident free, and other adults in the school have all been
very positive in their approach to Daniel. There was some initial apprehension
as this venture is the first of its kind in the school, but without exception,
everyone has been interested and supportive.
In common with most children with Down syndrome, Daniel's speech is his
weakest area, but it is definitely improving. The major part of his teaching
time each morning is geared towards improving the clarity of his speech,
and towards increasing the number of information carrying words in a sentence.
As a rule he can manage 3-4, but very recently he has been much more willing
to talk and will sometimes string together 5 or 6 words. When he is excited
and eager to get the words out in a hurry he tends to lapse into stutters
and gabble, before getting to the key words which give me a real clue about
what he is trying to say. He uses gestures and mime very effectively, but
obviously finds talking very frustrating at times, and he needs a lot of
encouragement and praise when he gets it right. The delight on his face
then is a real joy to see!
He tries very hard and does not give up easily. He reads fairly well, and
is beginning to show an improvement in his level of comprehension when I
talk with him abut a story he has read. His speech is clearest when he is
reading, and this has been a useful key to help him express himself. Another
of his strengths is considerable skill on the computer, and he loves to
spend time on a range of educational programmes, both maths and language
based, and also enjoys using it for writing.
I am responsible for organising his activities for the afternoons which
his ancillary oversees. To give him a measure of independence here, I list
for him a range of activities which he is supposed to work through in order,
and tick off each time one is done. He does not always do this, and sometimes
he is included in class activities such as watching a TV programme or a
games session, but generally he has got used to a routine of working at
his set tasks alongside the other children.
To increase the level of integration in the mornings, I have worked more
closely with the class teacher this term (Spring '93) to see how Daniel
could be involved in the topic work in particular. To achieve this I have
planned some of the practical activities myself, and include Daniel in a
group working on these, so that he can feel part of the class whilst working
at a level appropriate to his abilities. When I am working with a group
on an activity he has already done, I set him a task that I know he can
manage unsupervised, and check on him now and then. This is working well
in two ways. Firstly, it is giving him the chance to learn how to work on
a task without continual prompting from me, aiming for a measure of independence,
and secondly, he has the opportunity to feel more included in what is going
on in the class instead of always being engaged on separate tasks.
Looking back over the past two terms in which Daniel has been with us, I
feel that his transfer into mainstream school has been an exciting and successful
venture. His own cheerful and amenable personality has been a major factor
in enabling him to settle into a new environment with the minimum of fuss.
It has been very encouraging to hear from people who deal with him out of
school, such as his Sunday School teacher, that he has been noticeably more
responsive and talkative recently. His parents have commented that he seems
to have acquired a higher degree of personal dignity and confidence, and
he certainly seems happy and at ease in school. Progress is not a steadily
rising line, but a series of steps and plateau's of consolidation. Daniel
has undoubtedly learnt a great deal from this experience, as have all of
us at the school, and we feel it has been very worth while.